Posted Sep 25, 2008 at 10:25AM by Isaac C.
Listed in:
News
Tags:
Florida,
Jack Thompson
Ó
|
 "And don't you come back no more, no more, no more," and so on. Breaking news, gamers! The Supreme Court of Florida has approved Jack Thompson's disbarment.Aside from the disbarment, he is also ordered to reimburse the Florida Bar fees totaling to the amount of US$ 46,675.35. It was Judge Dava Tunis who recommended the disbarment to the court last July, saying that Thompson: [...] does not proceed within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior, but rather uses other means available to intimidate, harass, or bring public disrepute to those whom he perceives oppose him. Thompson, of course, responded to the court's decision, saying that the disbarment was the Court's retaliation for a case he won a few years ago, when the SC was forced to pay him a certain amount of money for damages. He explains in his press release that: This disbarment is in retaliation, among other things, for Thompson’s Tyndale House book Out of Harm’s Way, published in 2005, which blew the whistle on the Florida Supreme Court’s earlier efforts in the 1990’s to literally pathologize his faith-based and successful activism against the American entertainment industry. [...] This rush to disbarment is in retribution for the filing of that federal suit. With enemies this foolish, Thompson needs only the loyal friends he has. Well, looks like another court drama for Thompson. He has a chance for a retrial, but only if the motion is submitted by a member of the Florida Bar in good standing. Any bets on the chances of that happening? Related Articles: |
|
|
[Via Kotaku]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
37 Comments
|
 |
by Advertising - |
|
 
|
|
by Nevers - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» Ding Dong
The D!p*****s gone
Oh well... I give it a month before we see this joker on Faux News or "Dr" Phil spouting BS and listed as some kinda Violence in Video games expert.
The D!p*****s gone
Oh well... I give it a month before we see this joker on Faux News or "Dr" Phil spouting BS and listed as some kinda Violence in Video games expert.
|
Re: GW2 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» Took them long enough eh?
The instant he started slandering and acting unprofessionally they should have done this.
The instant he started slandering and acting unprofessionally they should have done this.
|
Re: TimShady87 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» .
I remember when they listed him as something like that on the news after virginia tech. Who the hell gave him that title? Himself i guess. Jack Thompson you suck!
I remember when they listed him as something like that on the news after virginia tech. Who the hell gave him that title? Himself i guess. Jack Thompson you suck!
|
Re: Nevers - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» I believe you are correct, good sir....
and I'm thinkin' it was on Faux News, but I can't remember.
and I'm thinkin' it was on Faux News, but I can't remember.
|
by Matt-N - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» ...
"This disbarment is in retaliation, among other things..."
Yeah, and those other things are:
not proceeding within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior, but rather using other means available to intimidate, harass, or bring public disrepute to those whom he perceives opposes him.
Just as the supreme Court ruled, you c0ck lol!
"This disbarment is in retaliation, among other things..."
Yeah, and those other things are:
not proceeding within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior, but rather using other means available to intimidate, harass, or bring public disrepute to those whom he perceives opposes him.
Just as the supreme Court ruled, you c0ck lol!
|
Re: hush404 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» OMG BEST DAY EVER!?
I Got lego batman AND read this. Woo! ;)
I Got lego batman AND read this. Woo! ;)
|
by failtorespond - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» ..
Quite possible the best news I heard all day.
Quite possible the best news I heard all day.
|
Re: Nevers - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» Lol/weep
sad to say there's not much out there these days to 8) about
sad to say there's not much out there these days to 8) about
|
by NarooN - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» yay.
This made my day.
This made my day.
|
Re: Dorkus-1983 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» GLEEEEEE!
you and me both brother... after i came back home from work! savor the flavor, this only happens once!!
you and me both brother... after i came back home from work! savor the flavor, this only happens once!!
|
by Dremth - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» *shiver*
jack thompson is so creepy. im glad he lost.
jack thompson is so creepy. im glad he lost.
|
by Binary - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» w00t
yay!!!!!
yay!!!!!
|
by RommelTJ - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» thompson
Cheer up Jack! Go play some videogames!
Cheer up Jack! Go play some videogames!
|
by Achooist - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» ICE CREAM ON ME!
w00t free Ice Cream to celebrate!
Just call me and ask!
Cell - 305-588-3005
Home - 305-666-4366
w00t free Ice Cream to celebrate!
Just call me and ask!
Cell - 305-588-3005
Home - 305-666-4366
|
by Jtcp - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» All Judges, no jurors
Wow,
I ve got say that Im really surprised how many people on the internet especially, are so quick to raise their fist in judgement against someone they never met, never talked to or never even researched. You poor souls, you depend on everyone else to do your thinking for you and thats really sad, especially considering that among you there has to be some really intelligent people, there has to be.
Well I offer a different perspective on the matter to all those of the open-minded dispostition.
http://screwattack.com/HardNews/JTInterview
Nothing against QJ, but Destin from Screwattack who does the Hard News segments, was the only one in the whole video game community who had the balls to interview
Jack Thompson
Wow,
I ve got say that Im really surprised how many people on the internet especially, are so quick to raise their fist in judgement against someone they never met, never talked to or never even researched. You poor souls, you depend on everyone else to do your thinking for you and thats really sad, especially considering that among you there has to be some really intelligent people, there has to be.
Well I offer a different perspective on the matter to all those of the open-minded dispostition.
http://screwattack.com/HardNews/JTInterview
Nothing against QJ, but Destin from Screwattack who does the Hard News segments, was the only one in the whole video game community who had the balls to interview
Jack Thompson
|
Re: Jtcp - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» All Judges, No Jurors
Sorry about that, accidentally submitted by post, here the full deal...
Wow,
I've got to say that I'm really surprised how many people on the internet especially, are so quick to raise their fist in judgment against someone they never met, never talked to or never even researched. You poor souls, you depend on everyone else to do your thinking for you and that's really sad, especially considering that among you there has to be some really intelligent people, there has to be.
Well I offer a different perspective on the matter to all those of the open-minded disposition.
http://screwattack.com/HardNews/JTInterview
Nothing against QJ, but Destin from Screwattack who does the Hard News segments, was the only one in the whole video game community who had the balls to actually call and interview Jack Thompson and find out what he's really about.
I realize that the majority of you wont bother to listen to the link I posted because you're too satisfied and comfortable in your ignorance and hate for some one you don't even know.
I applaud everyone with an open mind who listens to the interview and does their own thinking and comes to their own conclusion about Jack Thompson, whether it be positive or negative, instead of following in this domino effect of thought that everyone else is a part of.
Peace
JTCP
Sorry about that, accidentally submitted by post, here the full deal...
Wow,
I've got to say that I'm really surprised how many people on the internet especially, are so quick to raise their fist in judgment against someone they never met, never talked to or never even researched. You poor souls, you depend on everyone else to do your thinking for you and that's really sad, especially considering that among you there has to be some really intelligent people, there has to be.
Well I offer a different perspective on the matter to all those of the open-minded disposition.
http://screwattack.com/HardNews/JTInterview
Nothing against QJ, but Destin from Screwattack who does the Hard News segments, was the only one in the whole video game community who had the balls to actually call and interview Jack Thompson and find out what he's really about.
I realize that the majority of you wont bother to listen to the link I posted because you're too satisfied and comfortable in your ignorance and hate for some one you don't even know.
I applaud everyone with an open mind who listens to the interview and does their own thinking and comes to their own conclusion about Jack Thompson, whether it be positive or negative, instead of following in this domino effect of thought that everyone else is a part of.
Peace
JTCP
|
Re: nomder - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» From an intelligent person....
I watched a few of Jack Thompson's rants on tv. He lied many times about what could actually be done in video games and stretched the truth to extremes. Who cares who interviewed him. He was warned countless times to stop his nonsense rants about video games, saying games like Halo shouldn't be sold to 15 year olds. Just because he has a problem with the video game industry doesn't mean he has the right to tell everyone else about it. No one really cares what he thinks and his extremism does nothing for his cause but make him look like a fool. Personally, if he wanted to bring people to his side, he should have provided real facts instead of saying, "this kid shot that person because he played a game." And I don't think interviewing him has anything to do with having balls,but rather, with someone trying to attach their name to someone who claims to be a martyr for a cause which is pointless. If he wants to do good and push his Religious beliefs on people who clearly need it, he should spend his time counseling children of child abuse or children who are incarcerated, not kids who are perfectly normal playing games that seem to have no effect whatsoever on their judgment or well being.
I watched a few of Jack Thompson's rants on tv. He lied many times about what could actually be done in video games and stretched the truth to extremes. Who cares who interviewed him. He was warned countless times to stop his nonsense rants about video games, saying games like Halo shouldn't be sold to 15 year olds. Just because he has a problem with the video game industry doesn't mean he has the right to tell everyone else about it. No one really cares what he thinks and his extremism does nothing for his cause but make him look like a fool. Personally, if he wanted to bring people to his side, he should have provided real facts instead of saying, "this kid shot that person because he played a game." And I don't think interviewing him has anything to do with having balls,but rather, with someone trying to attach their name to someone who claims to be a martyr for a cause which is pointless. If he wants to do good and push his Religious beliefs on people who clearly need it, he should spend his time counseling children of child abuse or children who are incarcerated, not kids who are perfectly normal playing games that seem to have no effect whatsoever on their judgment or well being.
|
Re: nightros - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» Not the only one
Mike Krahulik, aka "Gabe" from Penny Arcade actually tried to talk to Jack Thompson before, but Jack being the ***wipe he is, refusd to talk to him, and then threatened to have a lawsuit against them.
http://www.penny-arcade.com/2005/10/14/
Mike Krahulik, aka "Gabe" from Penny Arcade actually tried to talk to Jack Thompson before, but Jack being the ***wipe he is, refusd to talk to him, and then threatened to have a lawsuit against them.
http://www.penny-arcade.com/2005/10/14/
|
Re: dd409 - 2008-09-27 |
|
|
» Just for you edification: "All Judges, No Jurors"
Disbarrment is done in the form of a hearing, not a trial. Hearing do not require a jury to be present.
Disbarrment is done in the form of a hearing, not a trial. Hearing do not require a jury to be present.
|
by Jtcp - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» From an intelligent person? How intelligent??
Nomder,
People change, you might not believe it, but its true.
The evidence is right in front of you, don't believe something just because you saw it on TV, for God sakes man.
Now if you have any sense, take two minutes of your seemingly angry and miserable existence and listen to the interview, its the most up to date one done and it was done with out any of the biases that TV adds, no comments taken out of context, no agendas, it might actually surprise you to see what kind of person
Jack Thompson is, doesn't everyone deserve one fair chance?
Don't you?
You say you don't think interviewing Jack Thompson has anything balls? Well then let me ask you something, what the h3ll have you done to find out the real story about this guy besides believing what you watch on TV??
Also Destin from screwattack obviously has so no intent on being a martyr for Thompson.
And by the way, who the hell are you to tell anyone how they should spend their time in life?? Jack Thompson a lawyer not a counselor, and by the way what is this amazing thing your doing in life to make a positive impact on society and the people around you? Oh, nothing?
You just sound just like every other mal-motivated, apathetic and indifferent person in this world.
I really look forward to reading the posts of people who don't have to post a message declaring their intelligence, who have listened to the interview.
Nomder,
People change, you might not believe it, but its true.
The evidence is right in front of you, don't believe something just because you saw it on TV, for God sakes man.
Now if you have any sense, take two minutes of your seemingly angry and miserable existence and listen to the interview, its the most up to date one done and it was done with out any of the biases that TV adds, no comments taken out of context, no agendas, it might actually surprise you to see what kind of person
Jack Thompson is, doesn't everyone deserve one fair chance?
Don't you?
You say you don't think interviewing Jack Thompson has anything balls? Well then let me ask you something, what the h3ll have you done to find out the real story about this guy besides believing what you watch on TV??
Also Destin from screwattack obviously has so no intent on being a martyr for Thompson.
And by the way, who the hell are you to tell anyone how they should spend their time in life?? Jack Thompson a lawyer not a counselor, and by the way what is this amazing thing your doing in life to make a positive impact on society and the people around you? Oh, nothing?
You just sound just like every other mal-motivated, apathetic and indifferent person in this world.
I really look forward to reading the posts of people who don't have to post a message declaring their intelligence, who have listened to the interview.
|
Re: hush404 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» well.
Your lashing out at "intelligent person 1" doesn't seem to do anything for your stand, eh? You seem mighty upset by his reaction to your comment - which leads me to believe that you're just as opinionated as he/she - and while you seem to articulate said opinions better, you're really just of the same mentality and status. Taking your info from others, taking the "perspective" seat and projecting your impressions of it all on to others to help make clear; your point.
Sure, Thompson can be look at from different angles - depending on how you like to take on the matter. What media coverage you've seen, heard and read, but at the end of the day... it's Thompson's quick lashing out and "not proceeding within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior" that brought this whole mess. His inability to work withing the confines of the courts rules to a level that everyone else much adhere has gotten him negative attention from both the court, which relies heavily on prosecutors and other members of the court following said guidelines and rules to an acceptable degree and from those opposed to his opinions and ideal - which in this case is pretty much a good chuck of those known as "gamers".
So while some may choose to explain their anger and opinions on the subject as "I FN HATE HIM!! GRR DOG POOP!" It really doesn't give your a right to call them dumb and "un-intelligent" simply because your opinion differs.
Your lashing out at "intelligent person 1" doesn't seem to do anything for your stand, eh? You seem mighty upset by his reaction to your comment - which leads me to believe that you're just as opinionated as he/she - and while you seem to articulate said opinions better, you're really just of the same mentality and status. Taking your info from others, taking the "perspective" seat and projecting your impressions of it all on to others to help make clear; your point.
Sure, Thompson can be look at from different angles - depending on how you like to take on the matter. What media coverage you've seen, heard and read, but at the end of the day... it's Thompson's quick lashing out and "not proceeding within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior" that brought this whole mess. His inability to work withing the confines of the courts rules to a level that everyone else much adhere has gotten him negative attention from both the court, which relies heavily on prosecutors and other members of the court following said guidelines and rules to an acceptable degree and from those opposed to his opinions and ideal - which in this case is pretty much a good chuck of those known as "gamers".
So while some may choose to explain their anger and opinions on the subject as "I FN HATE HIM!! GRR DOG POOP!" It really doesn't give your a right to call them dumb and "un-intelligent" simply because your opinion differs.
|
Re: nomder - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» My seemingly angry and miserable existence?
I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that I am angry and miserable. Sounds to me like you are trying to project your insecurities onto other people. Rather than continue this pointless argument you seem so intent on winning, I'm going to give in and say you win. You seem like a pretty insecure person and I'm sure you're waiting at your keyboard to respond immediately after reading my response. Have fun stroking your ego!
I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that I am angry and miserable. Sounds to me like you are trying to project your insecurities onto other people. Rather than continue this pointless argument you seem so intent on winning, I'm going to give in and say you win. You seem like a pretty insecure person and I'm sure you're waiting at your keyboard to respond immediately after reading my response. Have fun stroking your ego!
|
by cmonkey99 - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» yay!
"Another jackass bites the dust..."
Now only if the rest of the news was this good...
"Another jackass bites the dust..."
Now only if the rest of the news was this good...
|
by Jtcp - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» hush 404 reply
I applaud your ability to copy and paste from one article to you post. But does that really make you the authority on this whole Jack Thompson dibarment thing? I think not.
Dont pretend to have me figured out or "know" my mentality, I mean really could you have come across any more pretentious? As far as "lashing out" is concerned, I think not, its called making a "counter point" in an argument.
Taking my info from "others"? Try taking my info from one unbiased, independent source, one person, not a network not an agenda. So please, quit with this self-righteous act of yours, it especially doesnt work when you have to twisting my words to fit your agendas in your petty argument.
I applaud your ability to copy and paste from one article to you post. But does that really make you the authority on this whole Jack Thompson dibarment thing? I think not.
Dont pretend to have me figured out or "know" my mentality, I mean really could you have come across any more pretentious? As far as "lashing out" is concerned, I think not, its called making a "counter point" in an argument.
Taking my info from "others"? Try taking my info from one unbiased, independent source, one person, not a network not an agenda. So please, quit with this self-righteous act of yours, it especially doesnt work when you have to twisting my words to fit your agendas in your petty argument.
|
Re: Jtcp - 2008-09-25 |
|
|
» hush 404 reply full
Sorry, new keyboard!
» hush 404 reply
I applaud your ability to copy and paste from one article to your post. But does that really make you the authority on this whole Jack Thompson disbarment thing? I think not.
Don't pretend to have me figured out or "know" my mentality, I mean really could you have come across any more pretentious? As far as "lashing out" is concerned, I think not, its called making a "counter point" in an argument.
Taking my info from "others"? Try taking my info from one unbiased, independent source, one person, not a network not an agenda. So please, quit with this self-righteous act of yours, it especially doesn't work when you have to twist my words to in order for you to have any sort of argument.
You said while some blah blah blah so on and so forth, my answer, yes it does give me the right to call them dumb, why? Because as Ive stated in my earlier post they're all part of a domino effect of thinking, they all fall in line if the right person says something or if they hear something enough times "then it must be true", whether its true or not. So I say yes, idiots or at least ignorant, but how long can one abide in ignorance before its considered idiocy is any ones guess. But for now I think its safe to say that you can lump your self in with the majority on this topic as well. I'm sure it would take someone longer to write a generic "I'm smarter than you" post, than to actually listen to the interview.
Sorry, new keyboard!
» hush 404 reply
I applaud your ability to copy and paste from one article to your post. But does that really make you the authority on this whole Jack Thompson disbarment thing? I think not.
Don't pretend to have me figured out or "know" my mentality, I mean really could you have come across any more pretentious? As far as "lashing out" is concerned, I think not, its called making a "counter point" in an argument.
Taking my info from "others"? Try taking my info from one unbiased, independent source, one person, not a network not an agenda. So please, quit with this self-righteous act of yours, it especially doesn't work when you have to twist my words to in order for you to have any sort of argument.
You said while some blah blah blah so on and so forth, my answer, yes it does give me the right to call them dumb, why? Because as Ive stated in my earlier post they're all part of a domino effect of thinking, they all fall in line if the right person says something or if they hear something enough times "then it must be true", whether its true or not. So I say yes, idiots or at least ignorant, but how long can one abide in ignorance before its considered idiocy is any ones guess. But for now I think its safe to say that you can lump your self in with the majority on this topic as well. I'm sure it would take someone longer to write a generic "I'm smarter than you" post, than to actually listen to the interview.
|
Re: Matt-N - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» ...
I can see this discussion going nowhere! Both gonna waste 30 minutes of your life with each reply. Give it up guys.
I can see this discussion going nowhere! Both gonna waste 30 minutes of your life with each reply. Give it up guys.
|
Re: hush404 - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» well 2.0
Wow. I copy a 6 word chunk of the article, slap it into some quotations and I'm accused of doing nothing more that plagiarizing? Does my response to your post make me an "authority on this whole Jack Thompson disbarment thing"? No. I merely voice my opinion on the subject; on how clean cut I thought it was and my take on your attack of others for not agreeing with your view on both the subject and a single interview. Regardless of how much you might think I'm "pretentious" - I merely pointed out that your reaction to "intelligent person 1" was completely defensive which clearly implies you care a great deal about your opinion of the subject and are willing to go beyond stating facts and counter facts to an argument and instead question the poster's intelligence; thus in your own mind giving you confirmation (at least in your own mind) that your opinion must be the more correct one.
Have you sat down with Jack Thompson and had a heart to heart with the man? No, you are basing your complete opinion of the events on a single article (thats what you keep referring to). You then claim a complete domino effect of lies as the reason for the opposing opinion. How do you know that "intelligent person 1" hasn't read numerous articles and watched 10x the footage on TV? Why does your presumption all of a sudden become fact because you say it does? For all you know, "intelligent person 1" could be Jack Thompson's relation (unlikely) and you just dismiss him/her as "part of the crowd who oppose your opinion".
You then finish your argument with the same tactics as you've been employing before. You categorize me in the "dumb masses" simply because I oppose your opinion and it's much easier to cast me off into an "un-important ground" so you don't have to deal with it.
Wow. I copy a 6 word chunk of the article, slap it into some quotations and I'm accused of doing nothing more that plagiarizing? Does my response to your post make me an "authority on this whole Jack Thompson disbarment thing"? No. I merely voice my opinion on the subject; on how clean cut I thought it was and my take on your attack of others for not agreeing with your view on both the subject and a single interview. Regardless of how much you might think I'm "pretentious" - I merely pointed out that your reaction to "intelligent person 1" was completely defensive which clearly implies you care a great deal about your opinion of the subject and are willing to go beyond stating facts and counter facts to an argument and instead question the poster's intelligence; thus in your own mind giving you confirmation (at least in your own mind) that your opinion must be the more correct one.
Have you sat down with Jack Thompson and had a heart to heart with the man? No, you are basing your complete opinion of the events on a single article (thats what you keep referring to). You then claim a complete domino effect of lies as the reason for the opposing opinion. How do you know that "intelligent person 1" hasn't read numerous articles and watched 10x the footage on TV? Why does your presumption all of a sudden become fact because you say it does? For all you know, "intelligent person 1" could be Jack Thompson's relation (unlikely) and you just dismiss him/her as "part of the crowd who oppose your opinion".
You then finish your argument with the same tactics as you've been employing before. You categorize me in the "dumb masses" simply because I oppose your opinion and it's much easier to cast me off into an "un-important ground" so you don't have to deal with it.
|
Re: Matt-N - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» @hush404
I wouldn't bother mate. You've already won.
At the end of the day, the people that would've looked into this case with the greatest attention to detail would've been the Supreme Court, and what was their decision? Disbarment is not a quick fix to a situation; it is a last resort.
Jtcp is one of those people: S/He is right, and everyone else is wrong... even Judge Dava Tunis of the Supreme Court!
Come on then Jtcp, tell me how thick I am... even though I've run my own successful graphic design company since 2001 and finishing the 3rd year of my law degree.
I wouldn't bother mate. You've already won.
At the end of the day, the people that would've looked into this case with the greatest attention to detail would've been the Supreme Court, and what was their decision? Disbarment is not a quick fix to a situation; it is a last resort.
Jtcp is one of those people: S/He is right, and everyone else is wrong... even Judge Dava Tunis of the Supreme Court!
Come on then Jtcp, tell me how thick I am... even though I've run my own successful graphic design company since 2001 and finishing the 3rd year of my law degree.
|
by Jtcp - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» No winners or losers, just perspectives.
Look,
In short, its never been about who is right or wrong.
The only thing that I've tried to do is offer and different perspective on Jack Thompson from a one man unbiased source. Obviously I can see that trying to stir anyone into any type of open minded, "think for yourself" area is strictly off limits between you all. Sorry I wasted my time.
Matt N. Tell you how thick you are? You run your own company (so do I, two actually) and you're finishing the 3rd year of your law degree? Congratulations! That sounds like a great accomplishment!
I would just keep one thing in mind...The Current President, George W. Bush graduated from Harvard, are you going to Harvard? I know I didn't. So as you can see parading your accomplishments (as good as they might be) doesn't always tell the full story about a persons intellect, especially in the case of a one George W. Bush.
Look,
In short, its never been about who is right or wrong.
The only thing that I've tried to do is offer and different perspective on Jack Thompson from a one man unbiased source. Obviously I can see that trying to stir anyone into any type of open minded, "think for yourself" area is strictly off limits between you all. Sorry I wasted my time.
Matt N. Tell you how thick you are? You run your own company (so do I, two actually) and you're finishing the 3rd year of your law degree? Congratulations! That sounds like a great accomplishment!
I would just keep one thing in mind...The Current President, George W. Bush graduated from Harvard, are you going to Harvard? I know I didn't. So as you can see parading your accomplishments (as good as they might be) doesn't always tell the full story about a persons intellect, especially in the case of a one George W. Bush.
|
Re: Matt-N - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» ...
HAAAAHAHAHA! No, I'm from the UK actually! The most involved and complicated law on the planet.
I will now ask you to keep one thing in mind: For all the stick Bush gets, he is the President of the USA. Now surely you wouldn't be following the media hype about him being stupid would you? The President of the USA... ... ... quite an accomplishment, wouldn't you say?
HAAAAHAHAHA! No, I'm from the UK actually! The most involved and complicated law on the planet.
I will now ask you to keep one thing in mind: For all the stick Bush gets, he is the President of the USA. Now surely you wouldn't be following the media hype about him being stupid would you? The President of the USA... ... ... quite an accomplishment, wouldn't you say?
|
Re: Nevers - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» Yeah, quite an accomplishment
But you totally FAIL Jtcp...
Bush went to Yale... bit different. I'm guessing (but pretty sure) that his daddy bought his way in; and his grade point average was the exceptional 2.35/4.00. He then applied to (but was rejected by) the U. of Texas School of Law. Hmmm...that 2.35 must not have impressed them. Go fig'
Stealing two elections was very very impressive... but it wasn't junior Bush's brains; it was his puppet masters. If you believe otherwise, I gotta bridge to sell ya.... .. . ..
IMHO the American people may never recover from what this horrendous administration has done.
Vive la Resistance !!!!!!!!!!
But you totally FAIL Jtcp...
Bush went to Yale... bit different. I'm guessing (but pretty sure) that his daddy bought his way in; and his grade point average was the exceptional 2.35/4.00. He then applied to (but was rejected by) the U. of Texas School of Law. Hmmm...that 2.35 must not have impressed them. Go fig'
Stealing two elections was very very impressive... but it wasn't junior Bush's brains; it was his puppet masters. If you believe otherwise, I gotta bridge to sell ya.... .. . ..
IMHO the American people may never recover from what this horrendous administration has done.
Vive la Resistance !!!!!!!!!!
|
Re: Krisman - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» interview
that interview was quite interesting seems like he isn't as insane as he is made out to be however that doesn't change the way in which he has acted on his oppinions. i will give him the benefit of the dought though after its possible he was treated improperly by someone in the industry over his beliefs first. i still will not like him though because if such is true retaliation in such manner would still be highly inappropriate.
that interview was quite interesting seems like he isn't as insane as he is made out to be however that doesn't change the way in which he has acted on his oppinions. i will give him the benefit of the dought though after its possible he was treated improperly by someone in the industry over his beliefs first. i still will not like him though because if such is true retaliation in such manner would still be highly inappropriate.
|
Re: Jtcp - 2008-09-28 |
|
|
» Matt N., Nevers and Krisman
Matt N. OK you're from the UK, great.
Most complicated law on Earth? That's an opinion (you've checked into every other countries laws or was that meant as an exaggeration?) I still feel as though you're blasting away about all these accomplishments you have in life as a way of finding some sort of validation or sense of self worth, if that's the case let me save you some years of wasted time, what your looking for doesn't come from you accomplish, it comes from who you are.
I will now ask you to keep one thing in mind, you're from the UK, you wouldn't understand the whole Bush thing, He is an idiot and his official title should still be governor Bush because he didn't win the elections, they were fixed.
Still quite and Accomplishment? The people of the United States who aren't asleep, think not.
Nevers, I totally Fail? A bit of an exaggeration I think. While I do agree with all that you've said about the current president and stand corrected on which school his daddy bought him into, I don't see how the mix up between one uppity school and the other makes for a complete failure.
Viva la Revolucion !!!!!!!!!!
Krisman, I really applaud your open mindedness and listening/watching the interview even though you still don't care for Jack Thompson (neither do I for the record) It does really seem like the guy isn't half the douche the media makes him out to be.
Matt N. OK you're from the UK, great.
Most complicated law on Earth? That's an opinion (you've checked into every other countries laws or was that meant as an exaggeration?) I still feel as though you're blasting away about all these accomplishments you have in life as a way of finding some sort of validation or sense of self worth, if that's the case let me save you some years of wasted time, what your looking for doesn't come from you accomplish, it comes from who you are.
I will now ask you to keep one thing in mind, you're from the UK, you wouldn't understand the whole Bush thing, He is an idiot and his official title should still be governor Bush because he didn't win the elections, they were fixed.
Still quite and Accomplishment? The people of the United States who aren't asleep, think not.
Nevers, I totally Fail? A bit of an exaggeration I think. While I do agree with all that you've said about the current president and stand corrected on which school his daddy bought him into, I don't see how the mix up between one uppity school and the other makes for a complete failure.
Viva la Revolucion !!!!!!!!!!
Krisman, I really applaud your open mindedness and listening/watching the interview even though you still don't care for Jack Thompson (neither do I for the record) It does really seem like the guy isn't half the douche the media makes him out to be.
|
by hush404 - 2008-09-26 |
|
|
» Well 3.0 ? :)
"In short, its never been about who is right or wrong.
The only thing that I've tried to do is offer and different perspective on Jack Thompson from a one man unbiased source."
Sure, it started out as that, but after I called you out on the instant your started calling others "unintelligent" and basing your counter facts all on one interview - it became a whole new beast.
"Obviously I can see that trying to stir anyone into any type of open minded, "think for yourself" area is strictly off limits between you all. Sorry I wasted my time."
Just because people in a mass all seem to come to a general conclusion and feeling about a topic, doesn't mean that they all followed like zombies and didn't bother to use their brain as a tool to come to their own conclusion.
You didn't waste your time.
"In short, its never been about who is right or wrong.
The only thing that I've tried to do is offer and different perspective on Jack Thompson from a one man unbiased source."
Sure, it started out as that, but after I called you out on the instant your started calling others "unintelligent" and basing your counter facts all on one interview - it became a whole new beast.
"Obviously I can see that trying to stir anyone into any type of open minded, "think for yourself" area is strictly off limits between you all. Sorry I wasted my time."
Just because people in a mass all seem to come to a general conclusion and feeling about a topic, doesn't mean that they all followed like zombies and didn't bother to use their brain as a tool to come to their own conclusion.
You didn't waste your time.
|
Re: Jtcp - 2008-09-28 |
|
|
» Well 3.1
"Sure, it started out as that, but after I called you out on the instant your started calling others "unintelligent" and basing your counter facts all on one interview - it became a whole new beast."
True, I admit it wasn't a good idea to call everyone unintelligent (dumb actually) but that doesn't prove that they aren't. If you're looking for validation that you're not dumb and you are emotionally distraught by my comment then I'm sorry, your not dumb :)
"Just because people in a mass all seem to come to a general conclusion and feeling about a topic, doesn't mean that they all followed like zombies and didn't bother to use their brain as a tool to come to their own conclusion."
I don't know if I can agree with this comment, I think most people believe what ever the news or media tells (which is frightening) them be it either through TV or news paper. Just look at how many people think that 911 wasn't an inside job.
"You didn't waste your time."
Neither did you.
"Sure, it started out as that, but after I called you out on the instant your started calling others "unintelligent" and basing your counter facts all on one interview - it became a whole new beast."
True, I admit it wasn't a good idea to call everyone unintelligent (dumb actually) but that doesn't prove that they aren't. If you're looking for validation that you're not dumb and you are emotionally distraught by my comment then I'm sorry, your not dumb :)
"Just because people in a mass all seem to come to a general conclusion and feeling about a topic, doesn't mean that they all followed like zombies and didn't bother to use their brain as a tool to come to their own conclusion."
I don't know if I can agree with this comment, I think most people believe what ever the news or media tells (which is frightening) them be it either through TV or news paper. Just look at how many people think that 911 wasn't an inside job.
"You didn't waste your time."
Neither did you.
|
by UNP - 2008-09-27 |
|
|
» To Jtcp
Are you the body president of the jack thompson fan club or something? Either that or you're Thompson himself, and I do know this kind of behaviour goes along with his tactics hand-in-hand.
You need to stop defending him. He broke the rules repeatedly, he annoyed and aggravated a lot of people, and he insisted on repeated and ever more frivolous lawsuits. Even when a killing had nothing to do with a game, he said OH IT'S COZ OF VIDEO GAMES LOLOLOLOL. There's even that time he made a bet with someone for $10 grand about a video game (he'd donate it to charity if someone made his game). Someone called him on that and made the game. Do you think he paid up?
Of course not. He said he was "joking". So the penny arcade guys wrote a cheque for $10K, signed it "For Jack Thompson, because Jack Thompson wouldn't" and sent it to a charity. He threatened to sue them. They sent him a bunch of flowers. He charged them with harassment.
If you want to defend this man's reprehensible, childish and unbalanced behaviour, be my guest. You'll be the only one, though, and it won't help you to cry foul when people call you for the dumb***** you are.
Are you the body president of the jack thompson fan club or something? Either that or you're Thompson himself, and I do know this kind of behaviour goes along with his tactics hand-in-hand.
You need to stop defending him. He broke the rules repeatedly, he annoyed and aggravated a lot of people, and he insisted on repeated and ever more frivolous lawsuits. Even when a killing had nothing to do with a game, he said OH IT'S COZ OF VIDEO GAMES LOLOLOLOL. There's even that time he made a bet with someone for $10 grand about a video game (he'd donate it to charity if someone made his game). Someone called him on that and made the game. Do you think he paid up?
Of course not. He said he was "joking". So the penny arcade guys wrote a cheque for $10K, signed it "For Jack Thompson, because Jack Thompson wouldn't" and sent it to a charity. He threatened to sue them. They sent him a bunch of flowers. He charged them with harassment.
If you want to defend this man's reprehensible, childish and unbalanced behaviour, be my guest. You'll be the only one, though, and it won't help you to cry foul when people call you for the dumb***** you are.
|
Re: Jtcp - 2008-09-28 |
|
|
» UNP
Yes, I'm Jack Thompson, its true. I want to apologize for this cruel charade and come clean about everything.
"You need to stop defending him."
Please don't misunderstand Miss, I'm not by any mean defending the guy, He's getting what he's got coming to him, just look at his career, he's always been about controversy. My only goal was to get anyone without a narrow mind to hear a particular interview in which he's doesn't actually seem like a douche at all. Now does that mean the media portrails of him are lies, well it wouldn't be surprising, the media has blatantly lied before, and it's not like anyone of us has this amazing intimate knowlegde about the guy to begin with, we only know what who he is because of how the media paints him, end of story. So in closing I don't nor do I support this guys "perceived" behavior, Nor would I support anyone that I don't closely know, I only wanted to offer a differing perspective.
Sorry if you're offended by that.
Yes, I'm Jack Thompson, its true. I want to apologize for this cruel charade and come clean about everything.
"You need to stop defending him."
Please don't misunderstand Miss, I'm not by any mean defending the guy, He's getting what he's got coming to him, just look at his career, he's always been about controversy. My only goal was to get anyone without a narrow mind to hear a particular interview in which he's doesn't actually seem like a douche at all. Now does that mean the media portrails of him are lies, well it wouldn't be surprising, the media has blatantly lied before, and it's not like anyone of us has this amazing intimate knowlegde about the guy to begin with, we only know what who he is because of how the media paints him, end of story. So in closing I don't nor do I support this guys "perceived" behavior, Nor would I support anyone that I don't closely know, I only wanted to offer a differing perspective.
Sorry if you're offended by that.
Contact Us:
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - November
| Most Commented | |
| (48) | |
| (43) | |
| (39) | |
| (36) | |
| (31) | |
| (30) | |
| (29) | |
| (29) | |
| (29) | |
| (27) | |
| (25) | |
| (23) | |
| (23) | |
| (22) | |
| (21) | |
| (19) | |
| (18) | |
| (17) | |
| (17) | |
| (16) | |
User Favorites - November
Accessories
(473)Applications
(15)Artwork
(86)Cheats
(47)Deals
(236)Diamond Card
(3)Events
(211)Games
(10569)Hacks & Exploits
(228)HD DVD
(217)Homebrew Applications
(32)Homebrew Development
(39)Homebrew Emulators
(4)Homebrew Games
(22)How-To
(96)Humor
(94)Imports
(16)Interviews
(1279)IPTV
(11)Linux
(4)Mods
(193)News
(11738)Off Topic
(1176)On Shelves This Week
(33)Opinions & Analysis
(1172)Previews
(1079)Project Natal
(28)QJ How-To Series
(0)QuickJump QuickPeek
(35)Reviews
(87)Rumors
(963)Scans
(125)Screenshots
(887)Site News
(55)Software
(85)Videos
(2540)Weekend Warrior
(33)Xbox Live
(2476)XNA Studio Homebrew
(48)
Titles
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
