Posted Dec 16, 2007 at 02:56PM by Gino D. Listed in: News, Opinions & Analysis Tags: Microsoft, Sony, Intel, IBM, motion-sensing
Ó

Nintendo Wii, PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 - Image 1


Intel might have missed out on the current gen consoles, thus giving IBM the opportunity to shine by providing their processor technology to Sony (Cell microprocessor, anyone?), Nintendo, and Microsoft. No doubt, IBM has proven itself to be more than capable of moving mountains - or at least map interstellar space with the help of eight PS3 units.

But will this faze Intel? Nope. Not by a long shot.

Intel has now approached video games console makers and presented their microchips that could be incorporated into future consoles. Which isn't all that bad, considering that Intel's chips could execute 1 trillion (that's 1,000,000,000,000; a million millions) calculations per second.

Justin Rattner, chief tech officer of Intel imagines a future without analog sticks and buttons, with the help of their chips in processing cameras to track body movement as a form of interacting with the video game.

We imagine some future generation of [Nintendo's] Wii won't have hand controllers. You just set up the cameras around the room and wave your hand like you're playing tennis.


This might lead you to think that Rattner sees the future of video games going up the path of motion-sensing (Will Wright might agree with him on that). We're not sure; Rattner didn't say otherwise in any case. But if you check the results of a survey just recently, motion-sensing has gotten the popularity vote against high def.

Do note that Rattner just gave an example, and doesn't necessarily mean that that's the only type of future he foresees. Regardless, there's still an obstacle they have to face. Right now, they have a question in mind. Is all this push for next-next-next-next-gen performance worth it?

Is this whole infatuation with performance something that has moved beyond what the vast majority of users really care about? Are there really a set of applications that require ten, a hundred, a thousand times the performance we have today? And if we have it at an attractive price point, will it drive high volumes? It's still to be determined. There are still people who question whether the volume markets are there for all this performance.




[Via BusinessWeek] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


0 Comments


Sort by:


Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!