Posted Oct 31, 2008 at 10:19PM by Glenn M. Listed in: News Tags: Electronic Arts, EA Sports, Michael Pachter, Lazard Capital Markets, Colin Sebastian, Lazard Capital
Ó

After posting a lackluster quarterly report yesterday, EA fails to impress market analysts with its current standing. Even with strong annualized titles such as NBA Live and Madden NFL,  analysts believe that Electronic Arts just isn't taking full advantage of their growth.

"While we are encouraged by improving quality ratings of several annualized EA Sports titles, as well as recently released Dead Space (Xbox 360, PS3), we continue to believe the improving product execution is coming at a high cost," notes Colin Sebastian of Lazard Capital Markets. "EA's margins are ramping more slowly than we originally expected at the beginning of the year." Sebastian has already lowered his rating on the stock from "Buy" to "Hold."

Madden NFL 09 from EA - Image 1


Some analysts were even more disappointed with EA, including  Evan Wilson of Pacific Crest Securities. "EA's results have been mediocre for too long," he wrote. He also noted that their actions "exacerbate the negatives that the video game industry is facing."

Wedbush Morgan Securities' Michael Pachter could not be more blunt about the situation. "EA management was somewhat aloof during the earnings call," he said. "With the stock hovering near a seven-year low, management continued its recent history of disappointment, and spent an inordinate amout of time sowing seeds of fear about the potential for a tepid holiday sales season."

But all is not lost. Pachter also notes that EA is very capable of turning the situation around. "Management has demonstrated an uncanny ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the eyes of investors," he wrote. Unlike Sebastian, Pachter retained his "Strong Buy" rating on the publisher.

If you're planning to put some money on EA, you might want to slow down and think again. Things can still turn around but it seems they've had this coming for a long time. With the continued growth of the gaming industry, EA just can't get caught sitting on its laurels.



Related articles:


[Via Gamespot] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


7 Comments


Sort by:
   by Advertising -
   by BloodMachine - 2008-10-31
 » Mediocre indeed...

EA has spent the last 6 years surviving off easy games. They update the player/driver names in their 80 sports titles every year and re-release what is essentially the same game, and they churn out an uninspiring and boring Need for Speed game every year.
Why?
It's piss easy, and critics and gamers alike seem to love it. I mean really. NFS is *****. It's gone to hell. HP2 was fantastic, Underground 1 was new, and then they just started recreating the same boring games. The sports games...well my brother religiously buys FIFA every year, and aside from new soundtracks and different menus it's all the same thing.

   by hush404 - 2008-11-01
 » News Flash!

Nobody gives a flying **** what Analysts think! Everyone has their own opinions on each dev company and quite honestly, EA is doing great lately at trying to bring in new IPs and jolt their existing brands.

   by spankmaster - 2008-11-01
 » miss quote possibly?

is it supposed to be "snatched "Victory" from the jaws of "defeat"?


   Re: shabghai360 - 2008-11-01
 » nope......

The investors often push for higher monetary benefits and to do this they will bully management. Management at EA has often thwarted this and Investors feeling smug have the tables turned at the last moment. I liked the "Jaws of Victory" money is ugly and investors have big teeth.

   Re: Charlybob - 2008-11-02
 » Yes it is.

Ignore shab, you're right, it is snatch victory from defeat. God knows how they screwed that one up.
   by damonous - 2008-11-02
 » That's why they wanted Take-Two so bad

Now it all makes more sense why EA tried so hard to acquire Take-Two. It seems as though they have a pretty clueless management team. When faced with a reality that they had no way out of their impending fiscal report using creativity and good business decisions ... they figured that they would just "buy" someone else's creativity to cover their mistakes.

What really sucks is that the employees have to pay for the management's poor decisions (with the announced layoffs).

   by TROG3NATER - 2008-11-03
 » Well EA is well gonna contiinue being EA

I find that yes this year EA has brought some good titles to the market one of them being Dead Space which I really enjoyed but games like Battlefeild Bad Company just didnt set right with me NFS yes yet another game they try changing every year but its never for the good of the game Army Of Two also has a sequel in the works I liked that game but really why a sequel is planned just cause it did sell alright is dumb,with that being said were going to continue seeing updated rosters for games and slightly new features every year because you know why cause theirs millions of dumbasses who are hyped just like the super bowl to buy it I being a Tiger Woods Fan am the same way I get one new feature slightly changed interface and im sold. Then they take are money and instead of improving there games which they just now started doing they buy other company's who can actually make games.



Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!