Posted Nov 11, 2006 at 06:05PM by Kristine C. Listed in: Interviews Tags: Microsoft, Neil Thompson
Ó

PS3 vs. 360


I'd quote some eloquent and awe-inspiring line from the Lord of the Rings right now. It goes along the lines of "I'd take you on anytime, buddy", but all my Tolkien knowledge eludes me at the moment, so let's just skip that. Long story made short, in an interview with GamesIndustry.biz, Microsoft's Neil Thompson says that the Xbox 360 is ready, waiting, and eager for the challenge which is the Playstation 3.

Out to prove that their sales last year wasn't solely due to the fact that they were the only next-gen console around at the time, Thompson deems it better that the masses would finally be able to make actual side-by-side comparisons of the two machines, instead of basing all opinions solely on news reports and hear-says about the PS3's power. As Thompson puts it, "Sometimes it's worse when you're fighting a myth, than when you're fighting reality." Hoping to go head-to-head on issues which include high-def gaming content, online services, and DVD platforms, Microsoft is gunning to show that bigger (and Blu-Ray) isn't necessarily better.

With all this attention turned towards the PS3 though, he was also asked on how he thinks the Wii will affect their business, and he replied that the Wii would not be competing with them at all as it is "an innovative, low-definition product", and that "People will make a clear decision as to whether they want that sort of product – a kids toy – or they want high-definition gaming and entertainment and all that it brings."

So, will the Xbox 360 achieve what it has set out to prove? Will the PS3 be the one console to rule them all? Or will the Wii prove to be the quiet, happy-faced contender who comes out on top while the other two are busy fighting? Hmm...

In the words of UFC's Big John, "Let's get it ON!"


[Via Games Industry] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


49 Comments


Sort by:
   by Adrian Smith (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » hmm

I totally agree with what that guy is saying about the wii. It doesn't even compete with the Ps3 or Xbox 360. Its just a little kids toy. Anyways, we will find out who is the winner out of the two in the 2008 holiday season. isn't that when all the consoles are competing each other?


   Re: DoctahhDooom (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » hahaha

Your gonna offend someone saying that the Wii is a kids toy.

Not me though, to be honest I kind of agree.

   Re: Xbox is the best (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » no

no, in the 2007 holiday season, all the systems will already be on the market for atleast a year.
   by Spector - 2006-11-11
 » Uh oh

Hell hath no fury like a Wii fanboy's scorn.

   by WonderStivi - 2006-11-11
 » PS3 will outsell 360, but...

That doesn't neccessarily mean that PS3 is the best console. Most PS3-fanboys are so stubborn and narrow-minded that they would never consider using a console other than Sonys. But they will probably realise in time, after spending 500$ on a machine that is nothing more special than the other console.


   Re: babyg (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » wow

lmao... if you think the 360 has a chance against he ps3 your funny.......narrow minded?.... i beg to differ..... oh sure you guys got 1080p (upscaled lol what a joke) didnt you guys say you didnt need it?........ next......... and the backward compatibility... oh wait.... how much of all this will fit on your 20gb hardrive?.....add it up..... yyaaaaayyyyy we still have 5gigs left for a demo............ lets download it...... wait... we can now get 5000p through upscaling?...... lets update our firmware before we download the demo......... holy fudge........ daddy gates daddy gates what does it mean when you have 3 red rings around the all seeing xbox360 eye?........ it means ima going to screw you up the arse son and make you pay for it........ hey maybe you can have some cool games that look good on my counsle...... like gears of war for instance..... yaaaaaayyyyyy it looks soooo good that we have to sacrifice allot of people online so you can only do 4v4...... but dont worry son...... if your ps3 friends wanna pick on you because there better, just let them know that you dont need 40 players like in resistance......... tell them all you need is 8, until a update comes out then bash them and tell them 40 is waaaaaaaaaaaay better then 8.........hey guys... i just got a brand new 50" 1080p tv.... lets watch some movies...yyaaaaaayyy... whats this.... we have to buy another addon for 1080p movies..... but thats a total of?.... its the same price as a ps3.......

   Re: ContrAss - 2006-11-11
 » well maybe

because all the must have titles are on the PS2...right? And now that many third party titles are going multiplatform you (xbots) are over joyed with the news!

Really dude, spending 500 dollars on a machine that includes interchangeable harddrive bay, blu-ray drive, hdmi (it means alot if you're into tech), free multiplayer, HUGE multimedia playback, psp streaming capabilities and all that jazz seems pretty crazy. 500 dollars for the 360 means options! Like an extra harddrive! OR Wifi! OR multiplatform games! Damn dude, maybe i should get the 360 for its options.

   Re: truth (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » all fanboys suck

Not just PS3 fanboys.

just last week an xbot tried to tell me 15 million 360s had been sold!!!

Idiots, all of them!!!
   by Advertising -
   by skidz - 2006-11-11
 » It will be a fun ride.

I am already enjoying it. ;D

   by ralph (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » Trash

Xbox 360 is an overheating piece of *****. And Wii? I think anyone with a brain already knows what kind of crap that is.


   Re: ralphmuncher (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » shut up, *****got

hey, I think I have a brain, VIVA LA XBOX 360 + WII!!!!
   by To all you ps3 fanboys (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » Why do you all even bother?

None of you have any stock in Sony so show the crap up. Who cares how it does. GET OVER IT!


   Re: Figboy - 2006-11-11
 » who cares?

all of us should care whether it fails or not. regardless of any console loyalties, losing Sony (or even Nintendo and Microsoft) would be a horrible loss to gaming.

without Sony, there would be no God of War, Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, Mark of Kri, Ratchet and Clank, Sly Cooper, Jak and Daxter, Resistance, Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, etc. nor would gaming have grown to the capacity that it is now.

fast fact: the SNES, at the end of it's lifecycle, had sold 60 million units.

by comparrison, the PS2 sold, in the same ammount of time, 106 million units (and counting). what does that tell you? that thanks to the Playstation (which sold 100 million units during it's lifecycle also), 40 million extra gamers joined the fray in addition to the 60 million that owned NESes and SNESes and supported Nintendo. Sony grew the market. thanks to them, developers now have the budget to make games like Gears of War, Metal Gear Solid 4, Mass Effect, Bioshock, etc. if it wasn't for that nearly %45 percent market growth, gaming would be vastly different.

the growth is a double-edged sword, but the worst offense that could occur if one of the big 3 went under is simple: no more choice. i don't know if you're old enough to remember, but it was a bit difficult back in the 80's and 90's when the only option out there was Nintendo (all the games were on the NES and SNES. Sega had some decent titles, but nowhere near the library of Nintendo's). the PS3, Wii, and 360 are all the choice we need, as they run the gamut of gamer tastes; the Wii: pure games console, the 360: great online console, the PS3: great multimedia console.

if one doesn't suit your fancy, there are two other alternatives (you don't like what the PS3 is offering, hey, here's an idea: *DON'T BUY ONE*). i don't care much for the 360, so hey, i'm not picking one up. i'm letting the folks that do want one get one, then, if i see some games that actually do pique my interest, i'm there.

not a single one of us should be rooting for the demise of a gaming console. look what happened with the loss of Sega with the Dreamcast. they really haven't been able to recover since in terms of the quality of most of their games. i'd hate to see that happen to Sony, Microsoft, or even Nintendo.

   Re: Vilhelm (Unregistered) - 2006-11-13
 » Figboy - 100% Agree

Figboy, I agree with you 100% unfortunately I think you're wasting your breath here. I own a 360 and might buy a PS3 down the road once all the bugs are worked out (every console has them) and the price goes down. But it seems the people on the net just like to ***** and complain without bringing anything intelligent to the table. Oh well...

   Re: 2323 (Unregistered) - 2006-11-14
 » Figboy I agree with ya man

I like all consoles and games. I hate stupid fanboys.
   by ContrAss - 2006-11-11
 » yeah right Microsoft

especially when you start those flippin rumors and doubt right? Once you slurr all that $h|t, of course you're going to issue a challenge! So what happens when PS3 comes, ram sales up your ass, then run off with dominance? You're going to make excuses then right? Christ, just because your fan base is dumber than a block of fossilized dino poo doesn't mean everybody is going to forget your mistakes. So screw your opinions and focus on your own damn problems.

   by haaaaaaa (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » lets see

I dont really consider the Wii as part of the console war. Only time will tell which system will be better.... the ps3... or the next xbox....haha

   by Advertising -
   by Kevin (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » wait

Guys the system isnt out yet. Just ficken wait till it comes out. I have a 360 i think its pretty cool. Yes i will have a ps3 also. You get so much for the price. Also the Linux thing is gonna be tight. Gears of war rocks, Gran Trismo rocks. Both systems are cool. There is no need to be *****ing tools and fight which ones are better. And ps fanboys need to calm down about the 1080p thing. It is a sweet feature because the res is much better on my sweet monitor. About the wii its not a joke its just new.and noone should be giving a system ***** because it isnt out yet. noone knows what is gonna happen with the ps3 or wii. As for q3 stop posting this ***** so we can keep the fan boys off this site.

   by Gears of War PWNed Halo (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » Gears of War PWNed Halo

Recently, there have been a lot of talks on ‘Craps of War’. MS said that when Sony releases the PS3 (it means Apr. 2006 - before the PS3’s delay), they’ll walk right into ‘Crapalo 3’. What a rubbish lie that was. Halo 3 will not be ready to be released until Nov. 2007 (the unofficial confirmation). How dare MS lied that Halo 3 will be released 19 (nineteen) months before the actual release date? Crapalo 3 was the reason all those idiots bought the Crapbox 360 including me because Halo 3 is the only game which is worth $70 among all X360 games.

Now, MS’s saying “play Craps of War instead” when this GoW is as good as Perfect Dark Crap? We don’t want another crap from you MS which sets low standard for the developers; therefore, developers can release craps with low budge and short production time. The followings are some examples: Crap Rising, Ghost Recon: Advanced Crap, Craps Row, Lost Crap (lost cause?), Phantasy Crap Universe, Crap Witch, Crapman Returns, Splinter Cell: Double Craps, Dead or Crap 4, Project Crap Racing 3, et cetera. MS must learn this fact. One A graded game is far better than ten class B or C games all added together, moreover one class A game needs less budget, time and brain power to make than 10 class B games do.

Crapbox Live Service is a total joke and nonsense; everyone but idiots knows such common knowledge. Such online service is totally free in PC gaming industry (except RPGs of course). MS started this whole ret@rded nonsense years ago because they have no moral. Sony’s PlayStation Network Service (PNS) is free exactly like the one in the PC industry. Sony also recently officially said in a document that they will never do (in the future) such nonsense & crazy thing to their consumers like MS has done with their XBL.

Now it’s a fact that Microsoft is a totally rubbish company. They have always run MS in such ways. Now what MS is doing? MS is releasing tidbits of info on Crapalo 3 from this Nov to Dec on 20 different days. No one has time to check out all those tidbits on Halo 3 scattered all over the net during 20 days. MS needs to learn how to shut up until they actually release it.

* 5 reasons why Craps of War’s gonna be the Halo killer. (Pros)
- Xbox fanboys are just happy if they see MS brand name on their games (so many people buy computer mouse from MS just because there’s MS logo on it)
- I heard a rumor that half of all X360 owners are those people who think their TV speakers can talk to them (these idiots think they are soldiers when they play first person killer games like GoW)

* 5 reasons why Craps of War is not gonna be the Halo killer. (Cons)
- Very bad frame rate when the actions are intense (it’s playing slide show, stutter-fest)
- GoW is all about camping (because of the 2nd person view); therefore, frustratingly boring
- Skilled players camp with shooting & hiding tactic again and again; noobies will come to them then those noobies will be killed easily by the skilled campers by shotgun or chainsaw.
- Button A is context-sensitive and easy to use; but the matter is that when you want to run away, sometimes you will be locked on a nearby wall instead; then he will have a very easy kill.
- 8 for MP (any first person killer game which can’t support at least 24 players is like not having any multiplayer mode at all, my Call of Crap 2 X360 version is collecting dust)
- the most boring standard team deathmatch (TD) mode only


   Re: syvl (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » hey reetaarrrdd

stop posting this everywhere
   by truth (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » um...

If MS was so eager to go head to head with Sony then why did they rush out of the gates a year early???

Getting a head-start doesn't sound like going head to head to me...

Well gents, the race is on. :)

   by Kyler (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » Ummm...

Okay, tell me what games Xbox has besides Halo that make up for what PS3 has in ALL of it's RPG's not including Final Fantasy's. I mean most of the games coming out for Xbox 360 will be on PS3 and I don't see any besides Assassin's Creed coming out that actually looks good enough to buy for the 360 that the PS3 doesnt have, and by the way, 600 for a PS3 is not a lot, like one guy said on here earlier... you have to buy stuff for 1080p and not only that, but if you want wireless on your 360 you have to pay an extra 100$, and oh yeah the PS3 comes with wireless internet as well as no need for buying extra for 1080p. Also the PS3 comes with 60gb hard drive! Don't tell me you think you will be able to go get a hard drive upgrade for a 360 from the 10 GB premium buy to 60 GB for less than 100$ because that won't happen. Hmmm, which is the better buy in my opinion? PS3. And I even own a 360 as well, 360 has not impressed me at all and the games for it have all sucked besides Gears of War and a few others, but guess what? They are all coming out on PS3 too! A lot of PS3 games coming out actually look worth buying and playing a lot. So don't act like the 360 is better than PS3.


   Re: 360 fan (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » You got that backwards

"most of the games coming out for Xbox 360 will be on PS3"

I am thinking exactly the opposite. Everything worthwhile on the PS3 will be out on 360, which I already own, and it was cheaper. All of the Playstation "exclusive" games are *trash* that I got tired of one or two sequals ago. I have no interest in playing ANOTHER metal gear solid, gran tourismo, tekken, armored core, dynasty warriors..... the list of uninterest just goes on and on.

I am loving my 360, the games it currently has, and the incredible potential for the years to come.

For the PS3... I am just NOT looking forward to playing the same damn playstation games yet again, but with better graphics.

   Re: Spector - 2006-11-11
 » Don't ever!

Don't ever sully the name of Metal Gear Solid. Those games have caused for such a higher standard in games in general.

Do you not enjoy the wonderful voice acting, the great gameplay, or the amazing story which rivals that of most movies out there?
   by XboxHater (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » PS3 PS3 !!!!!!!

Back in 2000. There was an interview in the EGM mag. I've got it. They ask to Sony president, what will be the toughest opponent in the next year? The answer was :'' Microsoft if they decide to make a game machine but we will CRUSH THEM!'' And that's what gonna happen. After all the good news coming from the PS3 hardware this week they can't lose. If there was enough machine for the launch they will outsell the Xbox360 in one day...ok maybe two..

   by Mleep (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » PS3

This.... 'insane' demand for the PS3 has pretty7 ensured Microsoft a 3rd place in this race. (I don't see this trend changing.)
But the Wii is a questionmark. It may very well snatch second place. And it's even possible that it becomes #1. We haven't seen the demand for that conole yet, so it's too soon to tell, or rule out.

   by non fanboy (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » HOW LONG TILL................

I wonder how long until ppl get tired of the whole sixaxis controller. jiggling, shaking, while moving the thumbsticks and pressing buttons!! The Wii and the kids I can see having fun with it...but adults and the ps3? I can see myself turning this feature OFF!!

ps...definition of fanboys a.k.a. FANBIOTCHES
FANBIOTCHES: Person or person(s) that are BROKE and can ONLY AFFORD 1 console. They are known to wear (insert console here) panties and cheerlead for (insert console here).


   Re: Advertising -


   Re: Spector - 2006-11-11
 » hmmm

To answer your question I'll just put a post here when an eternity is up... ceya then.
   by rod (Unregistered) - 2006-11-11
 » lol naw

Losing sony wouldn't be a large a loss to the gaming. Most of the development studios would strike deals with different company's instantly. Also comparing ps2 to snes isnt really a fair comparison the leap to 3d graphics brought all sorts of new gamers, plus the addition of more realistically violent games ( entire gta series manhunt even resident evil.). The entire industry kind of grew up once sony released playstation which Ill readily admit is the best thing to happen since it was first introduced.

   by Erick (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » WOW

WOW nobody consider the Wii a threat. But I kind of agree too witht he kids toy thing.

   by CeCiL (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Ok Children...

Well, you can either agree with this or not agree... either way it's true.

Put it this way, Sony has had One year to refine the PS3 and improve on many elements that the 360 can do - that is, connectivity, adding bluetooth, builtin wireless, upgradable HDD, Blu-Ray etc etc etc ... Refined.

Now with support for many ... MANY media formats > 360
Upgradeable Firmware > 360
PSP - PS3 connectivity - Not on 360 (obviously)
Upgradable HDD's (non-official) > 360
USB HDD > 360
Homebrew > 360
Dual-Boot OS - Not on 360
Cell Processor > 360
First Generation Games > 360

Now you can argue as much as you like - but really, theres no point.

I am not dissing the 360 - i love mine and Gears of war is the best game i've played in years... but it's true... Hardware-wise, Sony has smashed Microsoft ... now the only thing that seperates them is sales...

Does that make the 360 crap? no. Does that make the PS3 better? No. But the facts are there and they are there for only one reason - So that... 'Gamers' NOT 'Fanboys' have the best possible gaming experience.

And yes.. .Losing Sony in the Console market would devastate the Industry... Sony is too big to fail, they are too important to, and same goes for Microsoft, they will never fail - will they ever overtake Sony? Unlikely, but as long as Microsoft and Sony are in the game - Gaming will only evolve - As for nintendo, well, they are too small now to make any noticable difference.

The Industry lies with Sony and Microsoft.... Don't like it? Then play PC or better yet, Marbles.

Game on.



   Re: ps3rider (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » you nob

you nob the xbox360 doesnt have a cell processor! that cell is what make the ps3 unique to all the other consoles! and btw dont but down things that are not official like the HDD upgradable!

   Re: Games4James (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » That's a rather pointless list!

>"Now with support for many ... MANY media formats > 360"

That appears correct. But as these are primarily GAMES CONSOLES, it's not really an issue.

>"Upgradeable Firmware > 360"

The 360 is upgradeable too (all done through XBL) and has been upgraded a number of times already, including the recent addition of 1080p.

So that's not a feature which is greater or worse in either console, since such upgrades are not just about adding features, but also about correcting existing problems.

>"PSP - PS3 connectivity - Not on 360 (obviously)"

Obviously, and so it's irrelevent.

>"Upgradable HDD's (non-official) > 360"

That's great to have, but it doesn't come for free, and is probably there because the PS3 seems to need the HDD more than the 360. With slower load times on Blu-ray there's a greater need to dump many GBs of files onto the HDD. Do that for 4 games on a 20GB PS3 and ALL the HDD space is gone! So it's pros and cons between the consoles.

>"USB HDD > 360"

I'm not exactly sure what you mean here.

>"Homebrew > 360"

Why? Because of Linux? Some guy here just posted info regarding Gamespot's on the spot report about XNA game developement on the PC and 360.

See post from Gamez here;

http://ps3.qj.net/How-to-install-another-OS-on-your-PS3-/pg/49/aid/72538#comments

Come back when I can create games like that on my PS3! So right now, if anything, homebrew is better on the 360. We'll have to wait and see what happens on the PS3.

>"Dual-Boot OS - Not on 360"

Remind me again, this is a games console, right? Just HAVING such a feature does not make it better.

>"Cell Processor > 360"

Cell processor is better for floating-point calculations ONLY, but worse for running general code compared to the 360's CPU. So it's as simple as you make out, and therefore you cannot say one processor is better than another, all you can say is one processor is better for CERATIN tasks compared to the other.

>"First Generation Games > 360"

1st generation games on a much delayed console is NOT the same and therefore that comparison is irrelevent. If the PS3 was delayed by another 2 years, the so-called 1st generation games would look and play even better, right?. Because of the 6-9 month delay, PS3's first generation games have had as much developement time as many 360 second generation games, which is why the quality is so simliar between them and will remain so throughout this gen.

   Re: Games4James (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Need a spell checker. :)

Corrected paragraph ---

>"Cell Processor > 360"

The Cell processor is better for floating-point calculations ONLY, but worse for running general code compared to the 360's CPU. So it's NOT as simple as you make out, and therefore you cannot say one processor is better than another, all you can say is one processor is better for CERTAIN tasks compared to the other.

Both have their advantages and disadvantages.
   by dante18 (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » ps3 japan

ps3 already sold more then xbox360 in japan
Ps3 sold 100k units in 2 hour
xbox360 sold 91k in 1 year......


   Re: Thrash911 (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » A lot of childish comments in here. :(

I wonder how much energy is wasted by a lot of people in this forum, hailing one system and bashing the other. No middle way. Nooo. Xbox360 "SUXORS" (or whatever the term is..) PS3 "RULEZ" all. And of course the other way too. And to make points you have to throw words like "crap" in every game title, thereby arguing like a friggin' child.. Can NOONE respect ALL systems?? Why all this bashing?? It really sounds like desperate children..

Personally, I have an Xbox360 now. Already saved up for the PS3, so I can get it IF I want it. Because they are both probably gonna be some awesome consoles (yes, BOTH!! Shock and horror!!). Face it, MS and Sony have to make awesome consoles, because they are competing for the same market!

IT'S NICE TO BE A CONSUMER!!

   Re: syvl (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » of course...

JAPAN HATES M$

   Re: Xbox is the best (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » In Japan

In Japan only 3 types of games sell the most, those are Action, Rpg and Sports, Xbox 360 is not selling well because there is no AAA Japanese games for the system, now that has changed the recently released dead rising is doing well in japan, also konami's winning eleven soccer, and with the upcoming lost planet, blue dragon, and dead or alive xtreme 2 being released before the end of the year and good third party support, microsoft has the 3 genres covered and then some. Proof is in the sales, xbox 360 has been selling roughly 2000 units per week since launch, the playstation 2 in comparison sells roughly 20000 per week (1:10) just recently xbox 360 sold 6500 units in a week (1:4) a big improvement in my eyes, why?, because the AAA games are finally coming out. The Japanese are not bias toward xbox or microsoft there are simply waiting to see some good Japanese games on the system.
   by Steve (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Learn English PS3 boys

Why are all the PS3 fanboys virtualy Illiterate?
I can't beleive some of the ***** i have just read above.


   Re: Steve (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Lol

Virtualy + Virtually

   by boom (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Way up there to babyg

Maybe you've forgotten, but the 360 is only microsfts SECOND concole, the ps3 in sonys THIRD yet they are the same. id rather trust the 360 than the ps3. your bashing the 360 for the problems it has, and i do agree with some of the stuff you said, but i highly, no i totally doubt that the ps3 won't have problems and be perfect like how some of the fan boys say. and whoop-de-do 40 plyers! can you say, LAG!

   by HA (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » WRONG

HEy Dante18 your such a dumbass, only 80k PS3's Hit japan you *****ing retard!

Plus of course the PS3 is gonna sale out in Japan, there a bunch of narrow minded, stubburn Japs!

   by dude (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » connect

in fact you can connect just about any thing to the 360 thats including the psp and ipods.

   by DarkLegacy - 2006-11-12
 » Meh

It just shows how the generation of gamers has changed greatly overtime. Well back in the 16 bit era & even before that, Superior Graphics or how great the games looked didn't mean crap. It simply came down to what games were available to each system & how well the software libary was. Im one of those VERY few gamers that still velieve in that. Im not a fanboy of no brand & I do end up usually getting each system of the current GEN anyways. I will end up getting a PS3 sometime next year. There is nothing at all impressive about it ATM & 50% of there games being released for this year & Q1 of 07 will be on the 360 anyways. It's not that the Sony Fanbase is narrowminded, They are just loyal to there brand. It just seems that sometimes, brand loyalty renders retarded arguements from people. Like saying "Im getting a PS3 cus it can do 1080P & the 360 cant" is simply stupid. How good the game looks will not render how good the game is.

   by WonderStivi - 2006-11-12
 » PS3 & homebrew

I seriously doubt Sony's gonna open up the PS3 like a can of ***** for you to put in whatever you want. It's not like they've done that to the PSP.

Paying 600$ for something the 360 does splendidly just seems retarded to me.

1080p? What for? You ain't got a tv that can do that anyway, and I can't see 1080p being a relevant standard in the future. For HD-DVD and BlueRay, maybe, but all tv broadcasting is going to be 720p.


   Re: Sony Girl Gamer (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » Reply to WonderStivi

First of all Sony ps3 does support 1080p via hdmi. Another thing people do have 1080p hdtv's already in their homes (I've ordered the biggest tv in the world) Yes u heard right Panasonic 103" $70,000. So I know that my tv has 1080p/60. I will buy the ps3 soon as the second shipment arrives in us. I first want to see if any bugs are reported and fixed in the 2nd revision consoles. I'm not ashamed of being a sony Fan And I'm proud :-) So you can say whatever u like I don't care lol.

Peace out

   Re: WonderStivi - 2006-11-13
 » Yeah, right...

Spending $70000 on a TV, now THAT's moronic. Liar :P
   by Xbox is the best (Unregistered) - 2006-11-12
 » In Japan

In Japan only 3 types of games sell the most, those are Action, Rpg and Sports, Xbox 360 is not selling well because there is no AAA Japanese games for the system, now that has changed the recently released dead rising is doing well in japan, also konami's winning eleven soccer, and with the upcoming lost planet, blue dragon, and dead or alive xtreme 2 being released before the end of the year and good third party support, microsoft has the 3 genres covered and then some. Proof is in the sales, xbox 360 has been selling roughly 2000 units per week since launch, the playstation 2 in comparison sells roughly 20000 per week (1:10) just recently xbox 360 sold 6500 units in a week (1:4) a big improvement in my eyes, why?, because the AAA games are finally coming out. The Japanese are not bias toward xbox or microsoft there are simply waiting to see some good Japanese games on the system.


   Re: Sony Girl Gamer (Unregistered) - 2006-11-13
 » Wait + See

Fine but when it's installed I'll send a link to youtube for you Stivi we'll have the last laugh then.


Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!