Posted May 14, 2007 at 06:29AM by Ryan C. Listed in: Rumors, Games, Pro Evolution Soccer 6 Tags: Konami
Ó

Pro Evolution Soccer 2007 - Image 1


Rumor has it that Konami's Pro Evolution Soccer 2007 for the Playstation 3 would not only be considerably prettier than the Xbox 360 version, but significantly superior - up to three times the quality. This comes from an E-mpires forum boards poster by the handle of Shodan, who quotes a Korean Konami insider's blog (there's also talk about a confirmed Final Fantasy VII remake).

It's a possible theory backed up by some unconfirmed factoids: that Pro Evolution Soccer 2007 would benefit greatly from the large-capacity Blu-Ray format - the popular football game predicted to take up at least 18 GBs' worth of space. There's also the superior framerate the Playstation 3 version would also have, as well as online connectivity.

It's surprising that Konami let this much information slip out, so the veracity of the news is suspect. We can only wait for further developments, and we'll be sure to update you as we get them.


[Via E-mpire Forums] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


102 Comments


Sort by:
   by Meharis (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » BS !

I smell BS !!!


   Re: heath (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » 3 times better

How can you define what 3 times better is? Also to say it would take up 18 gigs is absurd unless it was all high quality HD video. I mean come on guys this is some really lame news and has no credibility at all. I know the ps3 fanboys are searching for everything they can to make their system last longer than the dreamcast but seriously at least use something with more credibility than some random post on a forum.

   Re: Folding Junkie! - 2007-05-14
 » Heath!

Man what is your problem? I agree with the fact that 3 times better is a totally subjective matter. As a matter of fact it is not even quantifiable. It is also lame news!

But if you think that the Dreamcast and the PS3 have anything in common except the fact that they are both gaming consoles then you are crazy.

   Re: wer (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Rushed game

I would be surprised if having an extra year to work on the game its not better, the trouble is its not hard to be 3 times better because it was only an average rushed game basically ported from xbox1.

   Re: xboxDefector (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » BRICKED XBOX!!

PLEASE I MY XBOX IS BRICKED!!!

help!

:'-(

   Re: LoveMachine (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » WOOHOO

Yeah baby that's what I'm talking about

   Re: Don Quixote (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Actually could be completely true, PES6 on 360 was just topping 7GB already

So factor in Bluray, that means at least more room for things like commentary, sounds, stadiums, textures etc. EA already complained that they had run out of space on a DVD9 for Fifa.

With last generation games using alot of a DVD9, I can see why we'd easy need over a DVD9 for all the newer highdef video and sound, that stuff takes serious space.


   Re: LoveTifa (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » OMG OMG OMG FF7 remake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

who cares about soccer, the Final Fantasy 7 remake is the REAL news here.

OK, I'm going to just die from excitement now

   Re: Advertising -


   Re: FriggenHugeOrc (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Kick Ball

You guys in the UK might care if it ends up being true but us Yanks could care less about another game of kick ball.

   Re: na2ru1 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-15
 » XBOX360 fans R DUMB

To think, all u idiots sayin its all gd with DVD9. lmao. Face it. Xbox360 is the 1 goin obsolete with its aging DVD player. Now thats as close to a dreamcast u can get. Nxt few years is trouble wen compressing games jus wont be enough.

GTA 4 and beyond is gna suck on 360. havin to restrict the freedom for developers to stick to 9GB

   Re: andrew witt-360 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-22
 » pro7

i will be VERY suprised if the game takes up 18gb i wud b very amazed if thy did this. the only way i can see it happening is if the put litraly every team and stadium in the world and i really dont think anybody could do that .
   by Joe Mamma (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » What a crock of crap!!

Man this rumor will disappear quickly. My predicition right now is that they will look no different and probably be better on the 360, especially the online portion. Oh, I love how this stuff starts.


   Re: PS3Rider (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » hmm

hmm do I smell a bit of jelousy from you? It this sort of news us PS3 owners love to hear just because we know its true. Our 1st gen games which are only using 20% of the PS3's SPU look as good as your latest games (apart from Gears: as that game is stunning). Just wait until our 2nd or 3rd gen games come out when devlopers can use to ps3 to its full potential!

   Re: zettrane (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » us products are a good thing sometimes

to ps3rider.

"we can finally use Ps3's full potential, muu ha ha ha ha" sounds like some evil villian in a comic book. it sucks that the only thing all ps3 owners have to look forward to is what could be. lets focus on the now. now i know the 360 is better graphically and funner to play which is most important. now i know that ps3 is not doing well and blu ray is unattainable for the common buyer being that 60% of the nation is middle class and already in debt. now i know for ps3 and blu ray to survive they better cure cancer soon. its just funny how japanese buyers support there home product, ie the ps3. why cant we do the same here. 360 is a great product and very fun to play. support the home team people keep jobs in america not abroad and stop selling out to the "full potential" of the flop we call the ps3.

   Re: datnizzle (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » dumb xboys

this is where dvd9 hurts the 360. think of mapping for all the faces. more space means more faces, better stadiums. say what you want less space is never better.

   Re: kniteowl - 2007-05-14
 » Shortsighted idiots...

should keep quiet. "Lets focus on the now" If everyone shared your attitude and your view then people would be forever stuck in the same place, "focusing on the now".

   Re: kutibah (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » RE: zettrane

The only reason the 360 is better now is because of it's one year advantage. when the 360 came out, it was also just hoping for better games, as any new console is.

and blu-ray is obviously attainable by the common man as it currently is out-selling HD-DVD 5:1....

although i agree with the job thing, i still dont think i should purchase a console to support someone's job when im overpaying for what its truly worth when i can purchase a ps3 and know that it is worth more than i paid for it...

   Re: Advertising -


   Re: Folding Junkie! - 2007-05-14
 » Zettrane!

First of all why don't you try to look up funner in a dictionary.

I am looking forward to many good things in the future with my console. Have you checked the facts recently BD is overwhelming HD-DVD more and more every day. I am not preaching BD here I am just stating some obvious facts.

Just like the 360 still has not reached it's full potential yet the PS3 is also still miles away. I will not even try to spew percentages and figures because I think that is ignorant and unquantifiable because you are talking about theoretical limits. But I will tell you that for a fact neither console has reached it's limit yet.

These PS3 games are 1st generation on a console that is admittedly more difficult to program for. The learning curve is much greater and truly good games will take some time to make. Make no mistake about it though the PS3 will get some great games particularly after the studios master how to program for it. This is not an excuse it is a fact.

BTW, cancer is just one of the many things that folding@home is trying to cure. Alzheimer's, Cystic Fibrosis, Huntington's, Parkinson's, BSE, and cancer are all things that folding is working to cure.

Geez, I shore em sad I bawt that there yousless PS3, must a bin the dummest thing I ever dun! Please man we are not stupid we just bought something different than you. Go hang out on the XBOX 360 forums and talk to someone like yourself. God knows that there are enough losers over their too.

One more question. Could you please tell me why the most ignorant fools with the stupidest remarks are always unregistered? Are you all cowards too? I mean it's easy to spew manure from your mouth when nobody really knows who you are. Is that it?

Go home! Can't the circus keep you freaks under lock and key?

   Re: damonous - 2007-05-14
 » Support the home team ... or it'll eat you

Hmmm... how many AMERICAN companies has Microsoft gobbled and liquidated? --How many competitors has it ruthlessly squashed via questionable business practices that the Federal Govt has had to spend HEAPING SUMS of taxpayer money to sue over and restrain from them repeating? --zettrane makes some good points, but "buy Microsoft because their American" isn't one of them. Besides, other than the Intel CPU (Sony's Cell is ALSO an American IBM product), I think you'd be hard-pressed to find any American components in an Xbox 360. As for hardware/software design-team jobs, sure. But, I think these superginormous megacorporations like Microsoft have also been the ones to pave the way for "Free Trade", and the resultant job outsourcing we see today. There's no way that Microsoft (or Mac, or Sony, or etc, etc) OS software, other bloatware, etc. could have sold in the volume that it does today if there were not dirt-cheap machines available for "the common buyer". So, in the end, I think we've all paid (behind the lines) for the right to purchase whatever mostly-foreign-component product we choose. "Home team" doesn't quite have the meaning it once did. Heck, even in sports "home team" doesn't mean anything, when you consider that 90% of any professional team is made of players who sold themselves to the highest bidder and transplanted their family to your 'home town.'

   Re: zettrane (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » i love it

i love people that get so worked up
playstation is a good product. however, just like sega and its many ideas that were ahead of its time, ie, tele genesis, first cd drive, virtual fighter and the list goes on, ps will probably see the same outcome. kutibah- bd movies are outselling hd and thats only been the last few months. that could be attributed to the fact that people who have the hd players are renting there movies not buying them. furthermore, hd is still the top seller of stand alone units. get your facts straight before commenting.
to all others, your comments are very valid, i understand that ms is a big company, i just like seeing our nations gdp stay constant and not fluctuate due to outside products.

   Re: Folding Junkie! - 2007-05-14
 » Actually...

"playstation is a good product. however, just like sega and its many ideas that were ahead of its time, ie, tele genesis, first cd drive, virtual fighter and the list goes on, ps will probably see the same outcome"

Actually the ps (aka Playstation) was 2 generations ago and was very successful. Where were you when that happened?

Now if you are talking about the PS3 you really should keep your fingers crossed. Not that your wish will come true but at least you could hope so. Hey, I have an idea. Why don't you hold your breath until it fails. No, you probably shouldn't do that you will be dead long before the PS3 is.

You really have no clue! Reality is not just a TV genre. You may want to come back to it sometime.

   Re: zettrane (Unregistered) - 2007-05-15
 » not a ps3 bash but reality

folding junkie, i never said that ps3's predecessors were unsucessful, im saying that ps3 is. you can go into any electronics store store from florida to maine and ask them if there is any ps3 available and they'll tell you they can't get rid of them.
your need to grap reality and face the fact that the hype that you were told is not true, you dont need to lie to yourself in order to justify that 700 purchase (599 for console, and 49 for controller and tax). i guess i can empathize, i bought a tag heuer kirium, ya know the one that tiger wears and it was way too much, i kick myself in the ass about it all the time. but i move on
your right though ps3 could be in a slump, and it has major potential, but damn xbox is selling better a year after all its hype has subsided from 2005 and the wii, sh^+* you cant get your hands on one.
what you fail to realize is that consumers are the judge not the people who know all the stats and figures of cpu's and stuff. bottomline is that if ps3 doesnt sell lots of units its going to die, and right now its future doesnt look good
360 is third in sales for the year right now almost 100k units over ps3, and thats a year after, that tells you ps3 is not selling

   Re: Folding Junkie! - 2007-05-15
 » Zettrane! Again!

I understand reality. I understand economies. I understand a lot of different things. One of which is that the PS3 is an expensive machine. Very expensive! It will take time to saturate the market with PS3 consoles. It will happen, though.

Ponder this for a second. How many 360 Elites are selling vs. the number of PS3's. The gap is not be nearly as large.

BTW, it doesn't require a degree in nuclear physics to understand why the Wii, given it's unique gameplay and much lower price, would sell more than BOTH of the more expensive consoles. Right now at least! HDTV in the majority of households is still not here. But as the market gets flooded with more and more expensive HDTV's the PS3 will begin to look like a more affordable purchase next to those expensive sets. Many of which will by then be HDMI and HDCP compliant with 1080p resolution. Have you seen how many 1080p sets are on the market already. Prices are dropping by the month. Soon the truth will start to be realized. Until then, have fun with your XBOX, it's a cool machine. It's just not the one that I want. Nor will I waste my time crying about how much I hate it and how much it sucks.

BTW, sorry about your watch. That was a waste of money!
   by Devise (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

"there's also talk about a confirmed Final Fantasy VII remake"


   Re: Devise (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » continue

The statement above proves this is total BS. How could you post this news? It's obviously a fake.

   Re: jayhawker09 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » um

isnt the term "confirmed" a bit of an oxymoron here? i mean, if its a rumor, then its not confirmed, and its confirmed then its not a rumor.
   by Constantinecy - 2007-05-14
 » hard to believe

Ok if the game actualy requires so much space to achive a certain quality (18Gb!!)then the 360 version will have to suffer quite painfull cuts in order to fit the game in a dual DVD(and it could be copressed as well). But the ps3 version being 3 times better...no that's a big exaduration!. Konami would never allow such a leak even if it was true.
Once more we will just have to wait and see..


   Re: Advertising -


   Re: Devise (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

360 version was 2GBs so your theory makes no sense.

   Re: Constantinecy - 2007-05-14
 » You miss my point

My 'theory' is based on the fact that even if the developers wanted the game to be better and bigger on the 360 in the first place they could not do it due to space limitations on the dvd used by the 360. Now on the Ps3 the space is no problem.
I hope this makes sense to you now, my friend Devise

   Re: Devise (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

Yes lets add more space but make it slower to pull off he disc. That'll help developers.

The extra space is only good for duplicate data to try and speed up data transfer rate closer to a more reasonable rate (still slow then DVD), useless FMV which Sony is so infamous for, and lossless audio that the PS3 can't even utilize.

Your just another Blu-Ray whore. Every PS3 owner has been raped by Sony into thinking it's going to provide something extra for gaming. Sony only added it to push their format and only really care that the format wins. If the PS3 dies making Blu-Ray a success Sony would think it's justified.

I guess your happy with a year delay and countless lost exclusives cause your precious PS3 can fold protein while you wait for MGS4 to come out in 2008.

   Re: Devise+***** (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Cry

Go cry you 360 whore, why do you even come to ps3 news ??

   Re: Blade (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Blu-ray Speed

You do realize Double Layer DVD's are read at 8x on the 360. And the data rate is almost equal to the speed of the 2x Blu-ray Drive. You do also realize I hope that the 8x Double Layer is the max on the outside of the disk at a burst read meaning it speeds up and slows down constantly were as the 2x Blu-ray drive is always at 2x when its being read, never slows down, data is always coming fast. You people need to figure out what your saying. The only time the 360 is faster at reading disks is when its a DVD-5 and even then it hovers around a 10x, DVD-9 hovers around 7~8x with slow downs. 2x Blu-ray > DVD-9.

   Re: booboo (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » turkey!

a bigger disc size can also do the same thing a larger hard drive does for you... you clump all the material into chucks and it reads faster than if the material is clumped all around the disk. the same amount of data on a full dvd could be placed on a 30% or so sized pie chunk

   Re: kniteowl - 2007-05-14
 » Stupid Xbots going ON AND ON

about "slow drive speeds" when its been proven to be the same. Get over it. You're just trying to compensate for something... like maybe a smaller capacity for games. Yeah, compression can help you but only so far.

I sense Disc Capacity envy here...

   Re: Slipstream0 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Dev's

Well, unless everyone on here has developed a game for the 360 and the PS3, then everyone (360 and ps3 fans) are talking out of their ass, since ytou have ZERO actual experiece with it.
What I DO know is whafrom what Bethesda said about Oblivion, which is that they said they needed to double-up information on the blu-ray disc. So if you have another major developer that released the same game on both systems saying otherwise, please tell me who. Untill then, shut your *****ing breathing hole.
   by I wanna PS3 instead (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Glory

Does Sony have a X360 buy-back policy, if you buy a PS3?


   Re: AoxomamoxoA - 2007-05-14
 » No buy-back policy

No.

I own all three consoles, and 360 is the one I play the most. I would say its a mistake to trade your 360 in for a ps3 (especially right now) since the only thing Ive used my ps3 for so far was about 10 hours worth of Motorstorm, and Ive had it since launch. But youre free to do whatever you choose...

   by hahaha (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » looks at the fanboys

fanboys are f,ucking gay. oh no my xbox 360 is *****, boohoo. wake up u f,ucking gimps ps3 is better and uses bluray so it can be better an i hope it will be !!!!!


   Re: Lurker (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » hahaha

pot calling the kettle black.

   Re: heath (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » how old are you

Your making fun of fanboys while posting the most immature post i've seen in a while... Man you fanboys are evolving into a whole new species.

   Re: King Ripper (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » What?

How can you say the ps3 is better just because it uses bluray? yea it can hold more data but that dont mean graphics will be better. Im not going to say what i think based on this article because there is no proof or nothing, we will just have to wait and see what happens!

   Re: Folding Junkie! - 2007-05-14
 » You want to talk about fanboys?

I will tell you where to find one. Look in the mirror, man. You epitomize the definition of a fanboy! Grow up!

   Re: retard (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » idiot

youre a fanboy, so dont talk.
   by Shatterdome - 2007-05-14
 » Well...

My Korean informant tells me it's the other way around, and actually 360 will be 8 times better then PS3....so there...


   Re: mack (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » nuh-uh!

I heard from my friend in........ asia.... that the ps3 version's going to be 1 bajillion times better than the 360 version!

   Re: kniteowl - 2007-05-14
 » WTF

LOL~
I heard from my Korean-Japanese-Asian hybrid informant that the Wii version will be 9999999999999999999999 times better... Its graphics would PWN the 360 and PS3 versions...
   by ok (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » .

not 3 times better maybe 2 times though lol

   by lmxloco - 2007-05-14
 » .

Of course the game will look 3x better on the PS3. The PS3 costs 3x as much as the 360, so it's only natural.


   Re: THHT (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » really?

so $480 USD times 3 is $600 USD? Interesting, I'll have to go pickup a PS3 if its worth $1440 and is only being sold for $600

   Re: lmxloco - 2007-05-14
 » RE: THHT

Ahh, and the joke actually *does* go over someone's head. I guess the word "exaggeration" isn't one that you've learned quite yet.

   Re: THHT (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » LOL

I got the joke, you apparently didn't get the sarcasm.
   by M3 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

"probably be better on the 360"

Oh yeah..... the console that has one game 2 years into its life that the ps3 launch games couldn't beat graphics-wise and only about two others even worth getting!

the 360 version of pes6 was the worst version even the psp had more put into it


   by Xbox is the best (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » sounds like

sounds like a sony fanboy to me. LOL anyway this is not official so its meaningless

   by Sup (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » sup

I smell alot of jealous xbots crying " its unfair~! ". But apparently they cant admit it so they have to shoot it down as BS.

   by m3 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ..

"by Xbox is the best
sounds like a sony fanboy to me. LOL anyway this is not official so its meaningless"


that comments abit like black people saying they cant be racist isn't it

   by cool (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » hm..

nice we will see that happen on some others games to not only on that game ps3 will have more nice game later this year the new gta will be better on the ps3 to




   by ThomasGOAL (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Hi

You need to know the Winning Eleven 11 are developped onthe PS3 (the 360 version is a portage)
Konami have the biggest budget of the serie for the version PS3, and the Korean blogger says Pro Evolution Soccer 7 PS3 is 3 times better than PES6 360.


   Re: kniteowl - 2007-05-14
 » Brilliant.

If WE11 is being developed on PS3 1st, I'd love to see how the 360 handles the port. Its been mentioned that shoddy porting from the 360 to the PS3 is the cause for a lot of the graphics woes in games like Splinter Cell Double Agent

   Re: jayhawker09 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-15
 » um

that and the games almost a year old....
   by Slicksin (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » here we go again

yet more fanboy ism, geez guys.

if the gpu and cell on the ps3 can make it 3x better, that would be 3x better than what?

isn't a footy game just kicking a ball around a pitch? so, does that mean you will be able to kick 3 balls around? :)

maybe it is just me, but i aint a fan of footy games, they all look alike and have the same gameplay, would like to know what they think is 3x better tho.


   Re: mack (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » things...

they have more things in it, like.... chainsaws, and explosions, and boobies, and swearing, and guns, and guitar solos, and fighter planes, and martial arts, and espionage, and missiles, and free roaming, and motion sensing, and protein folding, and blu-ray! that's what makes it 3x better.
   by 666 (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » 666

360 fanboys are so scared that they have to reply. I'm a PS3 fan and I don't care if this is true or not. Just ignore it.

   by jost (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » 3x times better

well 3 times better?

people are so stupid over here... So for the slow ones and the fanboys:

They mean the gameplay of Pes7 will be 3 times better than their previous effort (PeS6). That doesn't mean Pest on PS3 will be better than Pes7 on 360.

Think first, than write...

   by why not? (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Why not?

Well the PS3 is the primary SKU sp its only natural that it will be better on that platform. Just look at FIFA and PES for the 360 - they miss a lot of leagues ect.

I firmly believe that the PS3 will be superior to the 350 version - both graphics and content wise.

   by matts1900 - 2007-05-14
 » horse*****

what a load of horse*****, 'better' is a subjective term. why the hell do you bother printing this rubbish?


   Re: ecanorun (Unregistered) - 2007-06-01
 » PES6

I own a 360 and have pro evo 6 and it is *****. There are tactics missing and you cannot save your replays. The ps2 version is better. I love my 360 but i ain't buying pro evo on it again. This will be the reason why i purchase a ps3.
   by Creighton (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

the title of this article says it all - RUMOR. just wait until they release a statement about this.

   by Halo 3 rocks!!!! (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » LOL

HAHA!!! In a year from now no developer will be able to fit a decent game on that *****ty crap60 DVD. Developers don't want to go through the hassle. Admit it 360 fans you had your fun for about a year. Now it's time for the PS3 to rule the world as it should be. Damn, the crap60 got one of my favorite games though, GTA4. Now instead of having a excellent game on Blu-ray/PS3, we have to get this itty bitty game do to having to please those pathetic crap60 fans. Haha! 360 FTL, at least you had your fun.

   by Soheil Khan (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » 1.5 times

let them wait for the 3 times better , it's been several month that we are playing the game , and they just see it playing it in their dreams.

   by oceancalm (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Old News

This rumour has been doing the rounds for several months, I'm fairly sure I saw it on Digg back in March with a heading os Seabass loves ps3 or something

   by MJMaskrey (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » It must be true

It has to be true....as I'm sure Konami won't want anyone with a 360 to buy that version of the game. Makes total sense to rubbish that version so it stays on the shelves.

   by Forrest....Forrest Gump and Benjamin Buford Blue (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » Halo 3 rocks...Thank you...it appears that my "Crap60" moniker is spreading...here are some more to use

» Saysaysay....Can I start a Fanboy War....huh, can I?

» Heyyyyy Bubba...I gotta find Bubba

Yes, someone else sees the light.
Crap60
Trash60
Redringofdeath60
Burnmyhousedown60
BendmeoverBillandnickelanddimemetodeath60
PeterMoorespincontrolcompleteassclowncomment60
My5thconsole60
MyIneed2buyanewoneeveryyear60
MyHalo2.560
ForzaGTripoff60

Brought 2 u by BubbaGump Shramp Corporation

» Your not Bubba.....HHeeeeaaaayyyy BBBBuba!!!

Giantexternalpowerbrickanditstilloverheats60

Icannotchoosemyownheadset60

$180fora120GBharddrive60

IcannotripmyCD'sorDVD'sandputitonmyharddrive60

IcanonlyputmediaIbuyfromCrap60liveonmy$180harddrive60

7yearoldDVDtechnologylimmitingmetoapaltry9GB60

Microtransactionforalmostanythingextra60

Havenotmadeaprofitin7+years60

Notonlyhavenotmadeaprofit60but5billion+inthewhole60

CopiedPS2'suprightoronit'sside60

TriedbutfailedtocopySony'scontroller60

HDDVDsoontobeobsoleteaddon60


   Re: AoxomamoxoA - 2007-05-14
 » You cant be over the age of 13...

You sir, are one sad sad individual. None of those names are even humorous, you just bunched a group of words together and added 60 on the end. You must really feel like 360 is a threat to ps3 if you spend all this time thinking of names to bash it.

Do you really think console namecalling is going to upset any fans of the 360? Xbot, Microsuck, Crap60, who cares? Seriously, are there any 360 fans here who care?

Namecalling just shows the posters immaturity, and in the end only weakens his statements. If you want anyone to take you seriously try conducting yourself like an adult, and not some little kid on a playground trying to get attention.

I feel sorry for you, really, I do...

   Re: Stupido ^ (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » *****head

Who give a ***** what you feel for him ?? go to your crap60's forum *****

   Re: AoxomamoxoA - 2007-05-14
 » Stupido indeed

Fitting name, Stupido. You obviously dont realize news gets posted in more than one forum.
   by tret (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » QJ please dont start this RUMOR news reports again give us facts.

Pro evo soccer was a rushed out xbox1 port, any machine with the same sort of power as the 360 and a years more work on the game will always look better, this isnt news its nothing, If they bought a tennis game out now for PS3 and then spent a year longer working on the 360 version then the 360 version would look better. POINTLESS AND DONT START THIS RUMOR NEWS AGAIN PLEASE ITS BORING..

   by AoxomamoxoA - 2007-05-14
 » hmm

1) Who cares, its a soccer game (football for the UK peeps). Sports games are all the same, year after year.

2) Theyre refering to a years old game, so of course it will be better. Much like how PGR4 is better than PGR3.

3) This isnt even official, but even if it were it would still make no difference 360 or ps3 wise.

   by dude (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » hahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

too bad for xboooooooooo360s fanboys
hahahaha

   by guest (Unregistered) - 2007-05-14
 » ...

It should be better then pro on 360..

At the end of the the day 360 is an amazing kit, but pro on 360 is dissapointing. it lacks the pace, the framerate is *****.

True pro fans know that pro on ps2 is the best out there, heck id even say psp pro runs smoother than the 360 version.. 360 version is all looks.

I dont know if ps3 version will be 3 times better thats a stupid thing to say but it definately has the potential to be better than 360.



Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!